Wednesday, April 2, 2008

A Responsible Budget for Loudoun

Last night, on a narrow majority consisting of four Democrats and one independent, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors ratified a responsible budget plan for the County. On the same vote as the $1.14 planning rate last week, Supervisors Burton, Burk, McGimsey, Miller and Kurtz passed a billion-dollar budget which balances County revenues and County services in a responsible, sustainable manner.
In recent days, supervisors have heard from teachers worried about not getting pay raises and residents concerned about another tax increase. Chairman Scott K. York (I-At Large) proposed dipping into reserve funds to set the real estate tax rate at $1.10. Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio proposed a tax rate of $1.07.

In the end, though, Supervisor Jim Burton's (I-Blue Ridge) motion to set the tax rate at $1.14 passed 5-4, with Supervisor Susan Klimek Buckley (D-Sugarland Run), Supervisor Lori Waters (R-Broad Run), York and Delgaudio opposed. - Leesburg Today
We will all do well to remember that our Supervisors were elected to govern, to actually do something. That is what last night's vote is: an act of responsible government. It is always easier to sit back and snipe, to find fault, to discover some reason to oppose action, than it is to take responsible action.
Driven by a new Democratic majority, the board narrowly approved a $1 billion spending plan that requires an 18-cent increase in the tax rate to $1.14 for each $100 of assessed value. The plan is expected to result in a 6.5 percent increase in the average homeowner's tax bill. The budget year starts July 1.

The tax-rate increase is necessary to make up for an unexpected drop in assessments across the county, as well as the rest of the Washington area, that has resulted in a $25 million shortfall this year. It is also to accommodate the needs of the fast-growing Loudoun school district, which is expected to swell by more than 3,000 students in the fall, officials said. - LoudounExtra
In passing the Budget, our Supervisors refrained from squandering the rainy day fund on a short-term subsidy for lower taxes.
However, in a memo to supervisors Monday, County Administrator Kirby M. Bowers warned that dipping into the $108 million reserve could threaten Loudoun's fragile credit rating. That in turn could increase by millions of dollars the amount of interest that banks charge on the county's debt.

Fairfax County officials are considering drawing on their reserves to bridge a budget gap of at least $152 million, also exacerbated by the decline in housing values. However, Bowers noted, Fairfax has had a top credit rating for three decades, while Loudoun has had one only since 2004. - LoudounExtra
This is a remarkable act of political courage for local elected officials, who will not get wide recognition for their willingness to compromise, but will instead see the tyranny of unreasonable expectations wreak havoc with their popularity. The majority took the best action possible for the long-term interests of Loudoun's taxpayers by avoiding using rainy-day money. In doing so, they provided a protection against higher interests payments in the future, in effect preserving lower taxes for the long-term by introducing marginally higher taxes today.

The five Supervisors who voted in favor of this budget put the duty of governing well and fiscal responsibility above short-term political gains and easy advancement of narrow, irresponsible agendas.

LoudounExtra closes its article with a reminder that these circumstances are the fruits of the seeds planted by the previous Board.
In part, Loudoun's problem is the pace of growth. Although growth has slowed since 2004, when Loudoun was declared the nation's fastest-growing county of its size by the U.S. Census Bureau, the county has struggled over the years to keep up by investing enough in public safety and its overburdened schools. - LoudounExtra
The County has posted an excellent summary of the new budget on its website. Before renewing the political clashes over this vote, interested parties would do very well to read this summary, and decide whether they, themselves, could have done any better for all of Loudoun's citizens.

The County gets the last word.
The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors on April 1, 2008, approved a fiscal plan totaling about $1.6 billion for the general county government and school system for FY 2009. In response to the current economic and financial environment, the Board significantly reduced the budget that had been proposed by County Administrator Kirby M. Bowers, as well as the School Board budget request.

In adopting the FY 09 fiscal plan, the Board of Supervisors reduced the School Board’s budget request by $48.7 million. However, the school system will be able to use increases in state and federal funding. As a result, the school system will receive $55 million in additional revenue, including an additional $23.6 million in local tax funding, over FY 08.

Local tax funding for the general county government will increase by $13.3 million in FY 09. The Board reduced the County Administrator’s recommended expenditures for the general county government by $12.5 million. The adopted budget does not include funding for any new initiatives for the general county government. The Board only approved general county budget enhancements that are either offset by fees or that replace expired grant funding.

The fiscal plan includes a countywide real property tax rate of $1.14 per $100 in assessed value. This is a reduction of 7.6 cents from the $1.216 tax rate proposed by the County Administrator. Because of a decrease in the value of residential property assessments, the annual property tax bills for the average homeowner will increase by an average of $308, or 6.5%, during FY 09. - Loudoun.gov

5 comments:

Lee J. said...

Sorry but that vote just told the business community, Loudoun is not open for business. Businesses will stay closer in if they have to pay high taxes with a third world road system and tons of prime land covered in industrial. Those one story industrial buildings that are covering everything from rt 7 to the airport pay far less taxes on way more land then a class A office complex of 5 to 20 stories. Class A Businesses are not going to move into a industrial area.

The new BOs members took the wimpy way out and played the blame game instead. They just said by raising taxes Loudoun is not open for business. Anyone can raise taxes, but like we say in my business anyone can build a million dollar house and make it cost a million the trick is make it look like a million for far less. That is what REAL business people do. Value for your money.

Paradox13VA said...

Lee J,

I respectfully disagree.

First, blaming the current board for "Those one story industrial buildings that are covering everything from rt 7 to the airport" is disingenuous when it was previous Boards who approved and zoned those buildings. It's rather inappropriate to blame the tow truck for the accident, as it were.

Second, "businesses will stay closer in if they have to pay high taxes with a third world road system," begs the question, how does one build a better road system without higher taxes? Is the money going to simply appear by fiat? Furthermore, roads are a state concern, and one which has seen its share of political controversy of late. Blaming the Board for the current roads is, again, blaming the tow truck for the accident.

Finally, "That is what REAL business people do. Value for your money." There are two fallacies here. First, Government is not a business, it's a government. Businesses exist to make money, governments exist to serve and protect their citizens, and give them a voice in collective affairs. Measuring a government as a business is as inappropriate as measuring a business as a philanthropic society.

Second, it is very difficult to get a better value for your money than the local government. Our schools are a major source of our success and our home values (lower though they might be) - public investment yielding private returns. Our police have succeeded in sustaining a low crime rate in spite of the erosion of their officer-per-citizen ratio and cuts to new substations.

The return on a very small tax payment, considered against the actual household income of Loudoun is remarkable. Many citizens have proven willing to pay a lot more on the open market for parks (e.g. golf memberships) roads (e.g., Greenway tolls) and safety (e.g., home security companies) than we are asked to pay in taxes.

Government is not the problem. Taxes are not the problem. The problem lies with overconfidence among lenders, greed among executives and active incompetence at the Federal Executive level.

Businesses respect fiscal responsibility and that is what the Board of Supervisors demonstrated.

Lee J. said...

well paradox13va with your kind of thinking we will have to wait for the next board to see some innovative improvements hopefully.

First I have not blamed this board for the industrial popping up from 7 to the airport.

If we don't make this county attractive to businesses that can pay the big dollar taxes we will have even a worse crisis next year on and on. Roads are not just a state thing they are also a local we have voted for bond money to build one of the rt 7 interchanges. One loudoun as building another. ANd the one up buy Leesburg is also private developer money as well as rt 50 improvements and 28.

You can take the position that people got themselves in trouble with the banks. But guess what nobody knows the extent of this mess these are ticking time bombs going off by the thousands every month and no end in sight.
We knew the extent of the savings and loan crisis, we knew the enron and mci mess and on and on but we have no clue about this one except we can fix some of it right now. This crisis affects every property value in this county it affects the largest industry in this country the home building business and all the support businesses from dishes to landscaping. So not to help fix it now we are doing a dis service to every home owner in this county. By being angry with these people and not helping them is like biting off your nose in spite of your face. How many times have we heard in the real estate business we are at the end and things are going to start to get better and only to see a slight up tick then a bigger crash because no one is seriously dealing with perhaps the biggest financial crisis this country will see since the depression.

Our new county supervisors were irresponsible with this big a tax hike and past the buck to the previous bos. Sorry that is just being plain irresponsible to why the majority put them in office. They should be looking for ways to
revenue. How does Miller think he is going to grow the businesses here like he says he wants to when he just put up a big sign saying Loudoun Closed for Business by that big tax hike.. Not going to happen attracting more business by raising taxes unless we give them a tax break at the cost of us already here.

Paradox13VA said...

Let's dispense with the blame game on all sides.

I want to merely ask one question.

Where's the evidence that marginally higher property taxes inhibit business growth and migration into Loudoun?

Many high-tax areas are also significant sources of business growth (Arlington, New York, Boston). Where is the evidence that a marginal increase in property taxes will "close Loudoun to business?"

Lee J. said...

Watch and see how many class A businesses will move out to the fringe area of Loudoun.

I watch the Bos meeting a few weeks ago when they had commercial real estate experts speak and some of these experts were from national companies. They were not to high on Loudoun back then then. This 19% tax increase will keep them close in to DC and support those district's schools and services, why move out here? What be the incentive?? Perhaps our third world transportation and roads??? Maybe it would be nice to locate a beautiful office complex in our growing industrial complexes????? Companies need some kind of incentives to move. Have you not heard of big tax breaks like we gave to orbital or Jannela ???? So what do we do we raise the taxes instead. Yep these companies will be beating our doors down. I can see it now. This tax increase will come back to haunt this county in the long run by driving business out, not in.

My wife is in real estate and I have been in the building business as a builder developer and now designer. I have a lot of friends that run and own companies, and believe me this tax increase is not business friendly. My taxes on my home will alone will go up over two grand a year.